For as long as there has been theatre, there have been people trying to put into writing their experience of it. Here I am going to attempt to express what I thought of the play The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, which I went to see when it came to Edinburgh earlier this year. It’s a play I believe everybody should watch, raising important questions about what it means to be human, how we experience the world around us and value those close to us…whether truth is always the best solution. But I encounter the same problem as every writer before me – how do I possibly do a physical performance justice on paper? Playwright Simon Stephens’ adaptation of the novel must simply be experienced on a stage to be fully appreciated. Here, I present you: a novice critic’s view.
This was the National Theatre’s production of the play, itself an adaptation of Mark Haddon’s novel, which visited Edinburg’s Festival Theatre. It recounts the story of a 15 year-old autistic boy, Christopher Boone, who sets out on an adventure to discover the murderer of his neighbour’s dog, Wellington. However, along the way Christopher’s detective work uncovers a lot more than he was hoping for…
The production opens with a boy kneeling next to a dead dog and a woman screaming. This is the audience’s first introduction to Christopher (played here by Joshua Jenkins). The audience soon realizes that Christopher has been unjustly accused of the killing, but his behaviour still seems slightly unusual. He always tells the truth and has a natural ability with numbers, but is unable to understand metaphors or empathise with others – and he does not like to be touched.
Provokingly, the word “autism” is never mentioned in the play, yet these traits convincingly suggest Christopher is on the autistic spectrum. Jenkins portrays this meticulously and realistically, never overplaying the role, but allowing the audience insight into Christopher’s manner of thinking. He is able to make the audience laugh at a swear word, and then soon after evoke genuine empathy upon the discovery of a dark secret hidden in his father’s bedroom.
“It is not a play about disability, but rather a play about difference”, says Marianne Elliott, the show’s director. The audience accompanies Christopher on his journey, and begins to better understand his unexpected and anti-social behaviours. In a way that evokes Christopher’s mathematical way of thinking, the play’s staging places the actors inside the four panels of a giant cube, representing Christopher’s mind as it literally places the audience inside his head so we see the world through his eyes. This box is also a giant chalkboard upon which Jenkins draws facial expressions associated with basic emotions like “sad,” “happy” and “cross” – facial expressions his character does not fully comprehend. This blank, abstract set allows the audience to be transported to different locations, that may be real or imaginary, and sometimes both; we are enclosed intimately within Christopher’s perspective, allowing the play to work through the puzzle of its own plot as rapidly as Christopher’s mind does.
For example, the multi-sensory approach of the very talented sound, lighting and graphic departments allows the audience to experience Christopher’s inability to filter out the constant stream of information it is receiving. At times, such as one particular scene in a train station, these effects can become overwhelming, and the mixture of noise, strobe lighting and rapid movement on stage, enables the audience to empathise with and even experience themselves, the extent of Christopher’s fear and disorientation.
However, director Elliott contrasts these loud scenes with quiet ones that occur most notably in Christopher’s own home. When watching the two actors on stage staring out into the audience, just listening to the rain… the lingering silence is magical. In this moment, Christopher says:
“I like it when it rains hard. It sounds like white noise everywhere, which is like silence, but not empty…”
In addition to this, the use of projection throughout the play is breathtaking, from recreating the hustle and bustle of the London underground to creations of Christopher’s own imagination, such as his exploration of intergalactic space. In this scene, the ensemble cast are intricately choreographed, going almost unnoticed – and are yet crucial to the audience’s experience. As Jenkins recites his lines about space, he is slowly lifted into the air by the ensemble, turned and twisted, and helped to take huge jumping strides across the stage – creating the illusion that gravity has disappeared altogether.
The use of repeated cast and their characterization is highly symbolic; Christopher’s closest friend is his teacher Siobhan. In the novel she reads his book, but in the play she represents three different characters; Christopher’s teacher, the narrator, and also Christopher’s body at some points. She acts as the bridge between Christopher’s narrative and the audience in this dramatic irony.
Against this interestingly close and yet distant, aloof teacher-pupil relationship, the themes of love, rejection and fear brought to the stage by the characters of Christopher’s parents are particularly strong and poignant. Christopher misunderstands his parents very often and this is represented physically, as he makes it difficult for them to get physically close to him on stage. Furthermore, the entire plot of the story revolves around the death of a dog, illustrated by Wellington’s permanent chalk outline on the stage floor. The absence-presence of the dog highlights the autistic trait of finding it easier to understand animals than humans. Christopher says, “I like dogs. You always know what a dog is thinking. […] Also, dogs are faithful and they do not tell lies because they cannot talk.”
Therefore, it is not just me who finds myself asking questions about performance as I put it in writing: the play is all about what the nature of performance really is, what communication with each other really consists of, and how it makes us feel the way we do. In Christopher’s quiet moments of epiphany and poetic articulation, the way we think about all art forms is challenged – and who can make art in the first place. This play cannot fail to move even the stoniest of hearts – the emotion is raw and real, and allows real life to unfold in front of the audience’s eyes. It’s an absolute must-see.
Christina Intrator is amongst other things a medic. She loves percussion (ranging from pots & pans to proper djembes), long road trips no matter the destination and most importantly poetry slams! Although one would assume a 3rd year medic to always be at the Royal Infirmary, Christina spends a lot of time elsewhere – from the ball court in Dalry to Varsity Music shop on South Bridge – you will no doubt bump into her when you least expect it.
This article is part of Season V of PTL which is run in association with All About Trans.
We encourage all of our readers to donate to this season’s organisation: Gendered Intelligence.
If you want to stay posted with PTL content and musings, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
If you’re interested in getting involved with PTL – drop us an email on firstname.lastname@example.org.
(Images sourced from: here and here)
Powered by Facebook Comments